How to Contact Andrew Bolt: Phone number, Texting, Email Id, Fanmail Address and Contact Details

Andrew Bolt Mobile Number, Phone Number, Email ID, House Residence Address, Contact Number Information, Biography, Whatsapp, and More possible original information are provided by us here.

How to Contact Andrew Bolt: Phone number, Texting, Email Id, Fanmail Address and Contact Details

Andrew Bolt is a prominent right-leaning social and political analyst born in Australia on September 26, 1959. He has spent much of his career with the newspaper firm The Herald and Weekly Times (HWT), which News Corp owns. He has worked for both The Herald and the Herald Sun, which succeeded The Herald. His current responsibilities include blogging and writing columns for the Herald Sun, in addition to hosting the evening episode of the television program The Bolt Report. Bolt is a controversial public personality in Australia. He is usually accused of being aggressive, holding racist ideas, and making improper statements on various political and social problems.

Bolt was born in Adelaide to parents who were just-arrived immigrants from the Netherlands. He is a member of the first generation of Australians. When his father worked as a school teacher and principal, he spent his boyhood in isolated rural regions, including Tarcoola, South Australia. Bolt completed his secondary education at Murray Bridge High School and then traveled and worked in other countries before returning to Australia to enroll in an art degree program at the University of Adelaide. He decided not to continue his education and accepted a cadetship with The Age, a broadsheet newspaper in Melbourne. Before moving on to work for The Herald, he held the position of sports journalist at The Age.

During his stint as a reporter, he served as the newspaper’s Asia correspondent for some time. At this time, he was based in Hong Kong and then subsequently in Bangkok. Throughout the two election campaigns that the Hawke government ran, he worked for the government. Bolt has worked in various jobs across a wide range of television networks, radio stations, and print publications. Still Not Sorry: The Best of Andrew Bolt was the title of a book that Andrew Bolt published in 2005 that included a collection of his previous newspaper pieces. His column is published in The Daily Telegraph.

Bolt’s column is also published in the Herald Sun. In May of 2005, Bolt developed a forum accessible over the Internet where readers could respond to his writings by providing comments, suggestions, and questions. Some of these remarks were published on the website of the Herald Sun by him. On July 2006, the format of the forum was modified to that of a blog, which is more conventional. Since 2016, he has been a frequent guest on Nights with Steve Price four times a week, carrying on 2GB and Melbourne’s 3AW, 4BC Brisbane, and network stations throughout Australia. He appears regularly on radio station 2GB in Sydney for The Clash with union leader Paul Howes.

On May 2011, Bolt decided to leave Insiders to become the anchor of his weekly show on Network Ten called The Bolt Report. In 2015, Channel 10 stopped The Bolt Report, and the following year, Bolt began working as a contributor for Sky News Live. After that, The Bolt Report got its nightly format back on Sky News Live in May 2016, where it had been previously absent. Bolt criticizes Andrew Wilkie in an article published in June 2003 and includes a statement from a confidential intelligence dossier that was authored by Wilkie when he was working as an intelligence analyst for the Office of National Assessments.

How to Contact Andrew Bolt: Phone number

It was alleged, but never verified, that someone in the office of Foreign Minister Alexander Downer had given Bolt access to the paper. Bolt was the recipient of the information. The Australian Federal Police did not have any proof, according to a representative for the force, thus, they were unable to identify the offender. Regarding the Stolen Generation, Bolt and Robert Manne, a professor of politics at La Trobe University, have butted heads on several occasions. According to Bolt’s statements, there was no systematic deportation of children “for essentially racial motives” on a wide scale.

After Bolt challenged Manne, asking her to “name just 10” children kidnapped because of their race, Manne responded with a list of 50 names. In response, Bolt stated that the list included children rescued from sexual abuse and removed for other humanitarian reasons. Even though there was “a pile of documented evidence and eyewitness testimony,” according to Manne’s interpretation, Bolt and others were nonetheless engaging in historical revisionism. Bolt pointed to some cases where modern Aboriginal children were put “in terrible peril,” which “we would not permit for children of any other race because we are so afraid of the’stolen generations’ myth,” Bolt said.

The mere existence of the Stolen Generations has been called into doubt by Bolt. According to Bolt, this is a “preposterous and vulgar” fiction. There was never any policy in any state or territory for the systematic deportation of “half-caste” Aboriginal children at any time. He described the idea as “preposterous and filthy.” Robert Manne responded, stating that Bolt did not address the documented evidence that demonstrated the existence of the Stolen Generations and that this is an obvious instance of historical denialism.

After that, Bolt challenged Manne to produce ten cases in which the evidence justified the claim that children had been “stolen” instead of being removed for reasons such as neglect, abuse, abandonment, etc. Bolt then challenged Manne to produce ten cases in which the evidence justified the claim that children had been “stolen.” He argued that Manne did not reply and that the fact that he did not do so was evidence that the assertion that there was a policy of systematic elimination was unreliable. In his response, Manne said he had sent a list including 250 names with supporting documentation.

Bolt stated that, before a debate, Manne provided him with a list of 12 names that he could show during the debate: “a list of people abandoned, saved from abuse or voluntarily given up by their parents.” Bolt further stated that, in the actual discussion, Manne produced a list of 250 names without any details or documentation as to the circumstances surrounding each individual on the list. Bolt also stated that he was subsequently able to identify and ascertain the history of some of those on the list and that he could not find a case where there was evidence to justify the term “stolen.” Bolt also stated that he could not find a point where there was evidence to justify the word “stolen.”

He said that one of the names on the list of allegedly kidnapped children was that of a 13-year-old girl named Dolly. She was placed in the state’s care after being “discovered seven months pregnant and impoverished, working for nothing on a station,” according to what he said. The discussion between Bolt and Manne is a good illustration of the conflicting viewpoints that can be found about this problem. The analysis of other documentary evidence, such as legislative databases showing how the legal basis for removal varied over time and between jurisdictions, or testimony from those who were called on to implement the policies, is either not done at all or is done very little. The primary focus is on individual examples as evidence for or against the existence of a policy.

It was also included in the report that was called Bringing Them Home. According to a study of court cases conducted in 2008, Stolen Generation claimants have a tough time contesting what was written about their circumstances at the time of their removal. After suing Bolt and the publishers of the Herald Sun in 2002 over a column that he wrote on December 13, 2000, in which he claimed that she had “hugged two drug traffickers she let walk free,” magistrate Jelena Popovic was awarded a total of 246,000 dollars in damages for defamation, which she received in 2002.

Popovic maintained that she congratulated the individuals by shaking their hands and stating they had successfully finished a treatment programme. The jury concluded that what Bolt wrote was not truthful, unjust, and erroneous, yet, they acquitted him of any malicious intent. As Bolt came from the Supreme Court of Victoria following the jury judgment, he said that his column had been correct and that the mixed conclusion was a triumph for free speech. Bolt’s statement was made after the jury had reached their decision. The decision of the jury was later overturned by Supreme Court Justice Bernard Bongiorno, who ruled that Bolt had not acted reasonably because he did not seek a response from Popovic before writing the article and, in evidence given during the trial, showed he did not care whether or not the article was defamatory.

His statement outside the court was harshly criticized by Bongiorno, who later overturned the jury’s decision. A judgment was issued by Judge Bongiorno that awarded Popovic aggravated compensatory damages of $210,000, punitive damages of $25,000, and interest of $11,500. The judge found that Bolt’s “disingenuous” statements outside of court and the Herald Sun’s reporting of the jury’s finding considerably affected the damages granted. The judge also indicated that the judge’s ruling primarily influenced the jury’s decision. Later, the Court of Appeal overturned the award of $25,000 in punitive damages, but it affirmed the conclusion that Bolt had committed defamation.

In its decision, the Court of Appeal described Bolt’s behavior as “dishonest and deceptive and, at best, excessively irresponsible.”Because of two articles on Bolt’s blog in September 2010, nine people took legal action against Bolt and the Herald Sun in the Federal Court of Australia. The nine individuals filed a lawsuit in response to postings with titles such as “White is the New Black,” “White Fellas in the Black,” and “It’s so trendy to be black.” According to the articles, adopting an Aboriginal racial identity to gain political and professional influence among “fair-skinned persons” of mixed ancestry was becoming an increasingly popular trend.

According to the petitioners, the jobs violated the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975. They asked for an apology, reimbursement for their legal expenses, an injunction preventing the articles and blogs from being republished, and “further remedy as the court sees suitable.” They did not pursue damages. On the 28th of September 2011, Judge Mordecai Bromberg concluded that Bolt had violated the Racial Discrimination Act’s section 18C. The case generated a lot of debate. Bolt referred to the decision as a “terrible day for free speech” in Australia and stated that it represented a “restriction on the freedom of all Australians to discuss multiculturalism and how people identify themselves.

Bolt’s comments were made in response to the fact that the decision had been made. I said back then, and I believe today, that we should not emphasize the distinctions that exist between us but rather should concentrate on the things that bring us together as human beings. Mark Latham is under criticism for sending a homophobic tweet directed at Alex Greenwich, an independent MP in the state of New South Wales. Andrew Bolt and Pauline Hanson have both called the remark “disgusting.”Mr. Latham was scheduled to appear on The Bolt Report, which is broadcast on Sky News Australia, to address One Nation’s lackluster result in the New South Wales state election. This morning, Latham published a tweet that was so reprehensible that even he felt uncomfortable about it.

Andrew Bolt Phone Number, Email Address, Contact No Information and More Details

Andrew Bolt Addresses:

House Address:

Andrew Bolt, Adelaide, Australia

Fanmail Address / Autograph Request Address:

Andrew Bolt,

Andrew Bolt Contact Phone Number and Contact Details info

  • Andrew Bolt Phone Number: +61 8 9243 0533
  • Andrew Bolt Mobile Contact Number: NA
  • WhatsApp Number of Andrew Bolt: NA
  • Personal Phone Number: +61 8 9243 0533
  • Andrew Bolt Email ID: NA

Social Media Accounts of Content Creator ‘Andrew Bolt ’

  • TikTok Account: NA
  • Facebook Account (Facebook Profile):
  • Twitter Account:
  • Instagram Account:
  • YouTube Channel:
  • Tumblr Details: NA
  • Official Website: NA
  • Snapchat Profile: NA

Personal Facts and Figures

  • Birthday/Birth Date: 26 September 1959
  • Place of Birth: Adelaide, Australia
  • Wife/GirlFriend:  Sally Morrell
  • Children: NA
  • Age: 63 Years old
  • Official TikTok: NA
  • Occupation: Commentator
  • Height: 1.87 m

Business Facts

  • Salary of Andrew Bolt: $5 Million
  • Net worth: $5 Million
  • Education: Yes
  • Total TikTok Fans/Followers: NA
  • Facebook Fans:152K followers
  • Twitter Followers: 28.3K Followers
  • Total Instagram Followers524 followers
  • Total YouTube Followers: 32.2K subscribers

Gene Hackman Address, Phone Number, Email ID, Website
Email AddressNA
House address (residence address)Adelaide, Australia
Office AddressNA
Office NumberNA
Official WebsiteNA
Personal No.NA
Phone Number+61 8 9243 0533
Snapchat IdNA
Whatsapp No.NA

Some Important Facts About Andrew Bolt:-

  1. Andrew Bolt was born on 26 September 1959.
  2. His Age is 63 years old.
  3. His birth sign is Libra.

See also: How to Contact Andrew Yang: Phone number, Texting, Email Id, Fanmail Address and Contact Details

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *